The Shifting Electoral Winds

Today, I launched my electoral forecast on my main website, FDL Review. After extensive data collection and hours of calculations, I arrived the following electoral tally: 219 votes for former Vice President Joe Biden, 205 for President Donald Trump, and 114 "tossups." After assigning the tossup states to the candidates nominally leading in each of them, Biden comes out with a slight lead: 297 to 241. However, this apparent advantage obscures the fact that the 2020 race is really a 50/50 contest.

Seven months ago, it looked like Trump would win in a landslide. Two months ago, it looked like he would lose in a landslide. Now, the outcome is far less obvious and the momentum is with Trump.

Nate Silver's model—which is admittedly much more advanced than FDL Review's—gives Trump a 30% chance of victory, up from 21% on June 29th. Silver said that the forecast would shift away from Trump over time because of the corresponding decline in uncertainty, unless Trump improved his standing. Now, the forecast's header notes, "Biden is slightly favored to win the election."

Several recent polls show that Biden is within the margin of error in the national popular vote, which Trump is widely expected to lose. Rasmussen Reports, which leans Republican, gives Biden a one-point advantage; CNN polling has him up by four. Granted, the RealClearPolitics average pegs Biden's lead at seven points: 49.5% to 42.5%.

Biden is underperforming 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in the RCP average of battleground states. Further, he does not command a majority of the vote in any of the states that RCP identifies as battlegrounds, and his numbers recently dropped in Florida, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. (Biden did see an improvement in North Carolina, where he is tied with Trump.)

Finally, as I noted last week, Trump is rapidly improving his standing in the betting odds. Then, I wrote, "[T]he election is a coin toss. The people who put their money where their mouth is—political bettors—are approaching this point of view: The president's odds improved from 36.4% on August 1st to 41.7% today." Now, the betting odds Trump give a 45.0% chance of victory. Here are the data, courtesy of RCP:



It remains to be seen whether the ongoing Republican National Convention will contribute to Trump's momentum. Either way, after a rough summer, Trump is back in the driver's seat.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Anatomy of a Biased Poll

Image
YouGov, CBS News's pollster of choice, released a poll showing that former Vice President Joe Biden leads President Donald Trump by 10 points: 52% to 42%. Their sample consisted of 957 registered voters with a margin of error of plus/minus 3.6 points. According to YouGov, Trump leads Biden by 10 points (47% to 37%) among independents and by 88 points (93% to 5%) among Republicans. So, why is he behind by 10 points overall? The sample—i.e., the group of people that YouGov polled—was roughly 41% Democratic, 30% Republican, and 27% independent. Compare YouGov's sample to the actual breakdown of the electorate: 41% independent, 31% Democratic, and 26% Republican. YouGov's numbers, when adjusted to fit reality, indicate a much tighter race: 45.9% Biden to 44.4% Trump (my math is below). President Donald Trump The massive over-representation of Democrats in YouGov's sample is a textbook example of why conservatives and impartial observers reflexively discount public-opinion...
Read more

Trump Favored in Pennsylvania

Image
The RealClearPolitics polling average in Pennsylvania is Biden +3.7, with polls ranging from Trump +2 (InsiderAdvantage) to Biden +7 (Quinnipiac). I predict that President Donald Trump will narrowly win the state. Consider Muhlenberg College’s most recent poll for the Morning Call , which pegs Biden’s support level at 49% and Trump’s at 44%. 2016 election in PA Consider also that Muhlenberg’s final 2016 poll had Clinton up 48% to 42%, a six-point lead. Trump ended up winning the state by a little less than a point. The cross-tabs tell us why Muhlenberg was wrong: they found Trump only marginally leading males (45% to 43%), whites (49% to 42%), and independents (41% to 38%). The final results for these categories, per CNN exit polls , were 57% to 40%, 56% to 40%, and 48% to 41%, respectively. Thus, I am skeptical of some of the findings from Muhlenberg’s most recent poll, which shows that Trump’s lead is 49% to 43% among men and 52% to 44% among whites. Further, Muhlenberg has Trump ...
Read more

Ron Johnson Saves Taxpayers at Least $89 Billion

Image
By opposing a $1,200 check to each American and $500 for each dependent, Senator Ron Johnson (R., Wisconsin) pushed Congress toward a $600 check for each American making less than $75,000 and $600 for each dependent. In so doing, Johnson saved the taxpayer at least $89 billion. Ron Johnson ( Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ) Based on my calculations, there are at least 191,400,280 Americans making less than $75,000 a year, as there are 255,200,373 adults and 75% of income earners make less than $75,000 a year. Carrying over that 75% statistic, there are also at least 49,835,000 dependents (as there are 66,447,000 people under 18). These numbers are a bit low, as they yield a sum of 241,235,280—i.e., a cost of $144.74 billion after the Johnson intervention. The actual cost  of the handouts will be $166 billion. Prior to Johnson's intervention, the cost of the $600 checks to people making less than $75,000 a year would have been at least $229.68 billion (191.4 million times $1,200) an...
Read more